17 May 2013

Pope Francis Speaks Out against Immoral Monetary Policy




Again, this Pope is mysterious, formidable, and full of surprises; this is a gutsy play. I don't know the endgame here, but may Mary guide him and us. If you haven't yet read this talk, you should. He makes some very good points that probably won't sit well with many.

From Vatican Radio comes the English translation of the Holy Father's remarks to some ambassadors whose credentials he accepted Thursday:

...Ladies and Gentlemen, our human family is presently experiencing something of a turning point in its own history, if we consider the advances made in various areas. We can only praise the positive achievements which contribute to the authentic welfare of mankind, in fields such as those of health, education and communications. At the same time, we must also acknowledge that the majority of the men and women of our time continue to live daily in situations of insecurity, with dire consequences. Certain pathologies are increasing, with their psychological consequences; fear and desperation grip the hearts of many people, even in the so-called rich countries; the joy of life is diminishing; indecency and violence are on the rise; poverty is becoming more and more evident. People have to struggle to live and, frequently, to live in an undignified way. One cause of this situation, in my opinion, is in the our relationship with money, and our acceptance of its power over ourselves and our society. Consequently the financial crisis which we are experiencing makes us forget that its ultimate origin is to be found in a profound human crisis. In the denial of the primacy of human beings! We have created new idols. The worship of the golden calf of old (cf. Ex 32:15-34) has found a new and heartless image in the cult of money and the dictatorship of an economy which is faceless and lacking any truly humane goal.

The worldwide financial and economic crisis seems to highlight their distortions and above all the gravely deficient human perspective, which reduces man to one of his needs alone, namely, consumption. Worse yet, human beings themselves are nowadays considered as consumer goods which can be used and thrown away. We have begun a throw away culture. This tendency is seen on the level of individuals and whole societies; and it is being promoted! In circumstances like these, solidarity, which is the treasure of the poor, is often considered counterproductive, opposed to the logic of finance and the economy. While the income of a minority is increasing exponentially, that of the majority is crumbling. This imbalance results from ideologies which uphold the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation, and thus deny the right of control to States, which are themselves charged with providing for the common good. A new, invisible and at times virtual, tyranny is established, one which unilaterally and irremediably imposes its own laws and rules. Moreover, indebtedness and credit distance countries from their real economy and citizens from their real buying power. Added to this, as if it were needed, is widespread corruption and selfish fiscal evasion which have taken on worldwide dimensions. The will to power and of possession has become limitless.

Concealed behind this attitude is a rejection of ethics, a rejection of God. Ethics, like solidarity, is a nuisance! It is regarded as counterproductive: as something too human, because it relativizes money and power; as a threat, because it rejects manipulation and subjection of people: because ethics leads to God, who is situated outside the categories of the market. These financiers, economists and politicians consider God to be unmanageable, unmanageable even dangerous, because he calls man to his full realization and to independence from any kind of slavery. Ethics – naturally, not the ethics of ideology – makes it possible, in my view, to create a balanced social order that is more humane. In this sense, I encourage the financial experts and the political leaders of your countries to consider the words of Saint John Chrysostom: “Not to share one’s goods with the poor is to rob them and to deprive them of life. It is not our goods that we possess, but theirs” (Homily on Lazarus, 1:6 – PG 48, 992D).

Dear Ambassadors, there is a need for financial reform along ethical lines that would produce in its turn an economic reform to benefit everyone. This would nevertheless require a courageous change of attitude on the part of political leaders. I urge them to face this challenge with determination and farsightedness, taking account, naturally, of their particular situations. Money has to serve, not to rule! The Pope loves everyone, rich and poor alike, but the Pope has the duty, in Christ’s name, to remind the rich to help the poor, to respect them, to promote them. The Pope appeals for disinterested solidarity and for a return to person-centred ethics in the world of finance and economics.

For her part, the Church always works for the integral development of every person. In this sense, she reiterates that the common good should not be simply an extra, simply a conceptual scheme of inferior quality tacked onto political programmes. The Church encourages those in power to be truly at the service of the common good of their peoples. She urges financial leaders to take account of ethics and solidarity. And why should they not turn to God to draw inspiration from his designs? In this way, a new political and economic mindset would arise that would help to transform the absolute dichotomy between the economic and social spheres into a healthy symbiosis...


Twelfth Night Comes to Shakespeare at the Park

click to enlarge
From May 24 to June 16 in Forest Park
Details here.


15 May 2013

US Court of Appeals Dismisses German Homeschooling Family's Asylum Case

What a great country we have.

An Immigration Judge gave this homeschooling family from Germany political asylum because the German government does not allow homeschooling and would forcibly remove the children from their parents if they attempted it.  The basis for the family's decision to homeschool was religious in nature.

The Immigration and Nationality Act provides for a grant of political asylum to an alien who is unable or unwilling to return to their home country because of a well-founded fear of persecution, by his government or by forces that the government cannot or will not control, on account of his race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.

Longstanding Supreme Court precedent states that a fear is well-founded if it is subjectively held and also is objectively reasonable-- specifically, that there is at least a 10% chance of happening.

This case is tailor-made.

Except for one thing:  they are Christians.  No, make that two things: they are also homeschoolers.

I know immigration attorneys, and from experience it is obvious that in any case where religion is a ground for asylum that a Christian has a much tougher time obtaining relief than a comparable Muslim, Jewish, Jehovah's Witness, Falun Gong, Sikh, or other religious case.  Why?  Well, that seems obvious.

But homeschooling, pardon the expression, queers the deal here.  Why?  Because of the regime's attack on family and parental rights generally, of which homeschooling is  a subset.  Because your children belong to the state.

Anyway, a decision of an Immigration Judge, while binding for that particular alien, does not set precedent for other cases.  Therefore, the Immigration Judge's grant worked justice, gave this family their relief, and yet didn't set any general precedent that homeschooling was a protected or protect-able asylum ground.

This was not good enough for the current regime and its Injustice Department, which decided to appeal the grant to the Board of Immigration Appeals.  The BIA overturned the IJ's decision and ordered the family out.  It held there was no right to homeschool one's children, and that the German law was not therefore persecution.  This was the argument of the junta's lawyers.  Unlike a decision of an Immigration Judge, a BIA decision is precedential, and so in addition to the plight of this particular family it was vital for all alien's who face similar persecution that the family file for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Well, the regime continued its fight, and on the same terms.

The Sixth Circuit dismissed the case yesterday.  It upheld the removal of the family and the denial of their asylum claim.  The decision stops short of immediate total disaster, as it acknowledges that the U.S. Constitution "protects the rights of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control."  

However, it carries in it some potentially dangerous rationale. The Court held that the family did not prove persecution because the law against "truancy" was applied generally to all citizens, not just homeschoolers.  Because all Germans are forced to send their children to government schools, not just would-be homeschoolers, it is not unfairly targeted against homeschoolers.  Hence, it isn't persecution to fine, imprison or take children away from them.

Great-- except it could be applied like this:  all citizens are required to worship the antichrist, not just Christians.  Just because they have some religious objections to this doesn't make it persecution, because they aren't singled out.  

The problem of course is that most persecution works this way:  a tyrannical government doesn't need to harm a citizen that doesn't object to its tyranny.  Duh.

Well, the regime wins another round in its courts.  I would not be surprised to see that, victory in hand and lots of bad press on other fronts accosting it, the administration elects to grant status to this family anyway, in an exercise of pure discretion.

Rule of law aside.

14 May 2013

Larry Conners Wonders Whether IRS Targeting Him after Political Interview

Story at STLToday:

Is the IRS hassling Larry Conners?
 by Joe Holleman

Much news is being generated by allegations that the Internal Revenue Service recently has targeted conservative groups.

Now KMOV-TV (Channel 4) anchorman Larry Conners wonders if he is being targeted by the IRS because of tough questions he asked President Barack Obama during an interview in April 2012. 

Monday night, Conners posted his concerns on Facebook. The post begins:

"Shortly after I did my April 2012 interview with President Obama, my wife, friends and some viewers suggested that I might need to watch out for the IRS.
"I don't accept 'conspiracy theories,' but I do know that almost immediately after the interview, the IRS started hammering me."

In conclusion, Conners wrote:

"What I don't like to even consider ... is that because of the Obama interview … the IRS put a target on me.

Can I prove it? At this time, no. But it is a fact that since that April 2012 interview ... the IRS has been pressuring me."

Meatless Friday Tuesday, News Round-Up Edition




A few notes from the week that is...

1. Can someone tell me why the new trend of 'preventative' mastectomies? Is this a prudent course of action or just mutilation? And I ask that question without an answer in mind. I wonder if any moral theologian with a blog might weigh in here.

2. Tough times for Schnucks these days, financial and familial.

3. Il Duce is having a bad week, too. Now that he is safely foisted on the country for a second four-year period of destruction, the 'free' press has decided to think about maybe reporting some of the stuff he's done-- gently, so as not to offend.

4. Though not news, Dan Brown is an idiot. And yet brilliant. Unfortunately his brilliance comes from banking on the idiocy of his readers. His new book is ostensibly about the cool secrets hidden in Dante's Inferno about the evils of-- wait for it.... Overpopulation. Yes, you read that right, overpopulation. Though the rapid depopulation of whole nations, and the impending depopulation of the globe, are well-documented and breaking through the tired Population Bomb template at last, Brown wants us to do something to stop non-existent overpopulation:

Brown does briefly take on the Vatican in "Inferno" for its "meddling in reproductive issues" and he praises Melinda Gates, "a devout Catholic herself," for raising hundreds of millions of dollars to improve access to birth control.

But instead of reviewing church history, Brown has spent the past few years studying the future. He has immersed himself in transhumanism, which advocates the use of technology to alter the mind and body, and has his characters debate the morality of genetics. ... Overpopulation, Brown says, is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done. The author himself has not decided.


A real piece of work.

5. Finally, who knows? We may be able to stop invading other countries to spread freedom and democracy so we don't have to fight them over here distract people from the bad economy to secure our oil supply prevent the spread of WMDs.

One can hope.

13 May 2013

...Wouldn't Want to Be Ya

As in, see ya.

Abortion Doctor Gosnell Found Guilty of Killing 3 Babies Born Alive

Former Philadelphia abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell has been found guilty on three of four counts of first-degree murder involving the deaths of four babies.

He was also found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the overdose death of former patient Karnamaya Mongar. He will now face the death penalty in the sentencing phase.


09 May 2013





Not New, Not Improved

A reader was kind enough to forward an excellent article by David Warren, "The Hold Up", concerning his conversion to Catholicism ten years ago, what led to it, and what made it take so long.

From the full article at The Catholic Thing:

It took me fifty years to find my way home (to the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church)...My question for today: What takes people so long?
 
... I recall many occasions when the idea of being received into the Catholic Church occurred to me. Several of these were somewhat dramatic...

To start, as a sudden Christian convert, in England back in 1976, I actually first went looking for a Catholic priest, for it seemed to me then that the Church of Rome must offer Christianity, par excellence. Without invidiously naming names or places, I was sharply turned off, however. I was given a “Dutch catechism” to read, and other hints that the Church, then and in England, had gone New Age Marxist. Perhaps papism was dead.

... I soon found myself soused in High Anglicanism. The liturgy was impressive, the people seemed to take their faith seriously, and they called themselves “catholic."... 

...in my experience, whether or not it is acknowledged, the beauty of language, music, gesture, architecture, and art play an important, often-crucial role in drawing people to the Church. Such things testify to the Gloria. They tell us God is large, not small; that the argument of the soul is not with something shallow, mean, and strident.

But even at the level of “mere reason,” the argument for the authority of the Catholic Church was unanswerable. It wasnt a syllogism, or other formula. It was too obvious for that.

For in the view over twenty centuries of Christian history, how could “Rome” not be Christs Church? The question had only to be asked to see the answer. Of course, she was in every generation flawed, as every institution involving humans. But on this scale of history, the agitprop of a Luther or a Calvin became a farce. These were obsessions from some narrow place and time.

One may see this, and yet not act. For years I avoided reading Newman – for instance – because I knew he would rub my nose in this reality. I knew I couldnt stand up to him. Ditto with so many other saints and scholars of the Church. They would endanger my comfortable Protestant affiliation. Yet I did not consider myself Protestant; and was consistently well disposed towards the Roman fold.

Heres the thing. I cannot explain to myself, today, why it took me so long to become a Catholic. ... Naturally attracted to the Catholic Church myself, I was discouraged by attempts to present something “new” in it, by many of its (arguably) well-meaning representatives.

For two generations now, it has seemed to me, the attempt to repackage the faith in a more attractive way to a contemporary audience has been, quite obviously, self-defeating. For me, at least, the very attraction of the Church, and the best argument against the competition, was that it remained the opposite of “new.” People like me – admittedly, a reactionary – are drawn to the Church not by the scent of fashion, but instead by the promise of “Eternity.”

They are sick, sick at heart, with the spirit of innovation. It is the very thing they are trying to escape, as they approach the divine. The secular environments from which they are escaping are rancid with the “new and improved.” They have tired of salesmanship. More than tired: they are repelled by the slick and shiny. Christ, to them, is the opposite of that.

Though mostly free of liturgical learning and sophistication, I have noticed that the younger Catholics attending the Latin Mass, high or low, are riveted by its solemnity. I have seen this in many subtle but unmistakable facts. For instance, small children their parents had not tried very hard to control at Novus Ordo Masses, are now carefully controlled; and the children themselves seem to attune to the atmosphere of reverence.

[...]

Ascension Thursday







Grant, we beseech Thee, almighty God: that we, who believe Thine only-begotten Son, our Redeemer, to have ascended on this day into heaven, may also ourselves dwell in mind amid heavenly things. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, Who livest and reignest with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, one God Forever and ever. Amen.

Collect for the Ascension

Masses at the Oratory today at 8 am, 12:15 pm and Solemn High Mass at 6:30 pm.