27 December 2007

NCR Knows What's at Stake


The National "Catholic" Reporter has an article stating its position on the recent moves by the Holy Father to restore the sense of sacredness in the Church's liturgy. No surprises here-- it decries these steps and whines that there is "no going back" on the liturgical "reforms" since post-Vatican II. But what I find noteworthy is that NCR understands exactly what is at stake, better than many conservative Catholics. The Mass reflects, informs and transmits what we believe: about God, about us, and about the Church. It is the most important issue facing the Church. Full article above, excerpts below:

Issue Date: December 28, 2007
Liturgy reform: No going back

When the definitive history of the Second Vatican Council is finally written, beyond all squabbles over the council’s actual intent, one undisputed fact will stand -- that taking up the draft for the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy as the first focus of debate had a decisive impact on the tone and direction the council took in all its subsequent deliberations. Though the discussion was liturgy, the real subject was ecclesiology -- the church’s understanding of itself.

By invoking the church in biblical terms as the pilgrim people of God and as the body of Christ, Vatican II set the stage for a crucial shift away from the juridical “perfect society” embodied in the unabashedly monarchical church of Trent. Nowhere would this be reflected more clearly than in the way the church prayed. The throne room protocols of the Tridentine Mass, the elevations, barriers, brocade, structures and language separating clergy from laity gave way to a worshiping community in which all the baptized were called to full, conscious, active participation. A new way of worshiping marked the beginning of the end of the vertical ecclesiology that for 500 years had shaped every aspect of the church’s life and ministry around hierarchical and clerical preeminence. The council carried the same biblical imagery and expansive approach into the major constitutions on the church and the church in the modern world.

[...]

If liturgy has characteristically been below the radar for most Catholics, opponents of Vatican II knew from the outset that the one way to preserve Trent was to halt liturgical reform. To look back over the 42 years since the close of the council is to see that progress in the reform has been real but slow, and to admit that any awakening of Catholic laity to their full baptismal identity is still in the future. At the same time, those devoted at many levels to a pre-Vatican II model of the church have worked hard to bring down many aspects of liturgical reform.

Frustrating the process of vernacular translations, crimping the rubrics for Mass to accentuate the ordained and, most recently, restoring the Tridentine rite, are among the more visible signs of successful retrenchment.

But there really is no turning back. “Vatican II helped us to rediscover the idea of the priesthood as something universal,” Marini said in an interview. “The faithful don’t receive permission from priests to participate in the Mass. They are members of a priestly people, which means they have the right to participate in offering the sacrifice of the Mass. This was a great discovery, a great emphasis, of the council. We have to keep this in mind, because otherwise we run the risk of confusion about the nature of the liturgy, and for that matter, the church itself.”...

1 comment:

YoungCatholicSTL said...

I am starting to get tired of everyone saying "there's no going back." First, "going back" happens all the time. What is so wrong with it? That's what all the liberals want in this next election -- a going back to the Clinton-era. The Church is all about Tradition, and "going back" is a very positive thing. Second, why does everyone assume the actions of the Holy Father mean we're "going back"? Why can't these changes towards more sacred music, with an Ordinary and Extraordinary form of the Mass be seen as a going forward? I see it as a chance for us to finally leave the last 40 years behind us and go forward as truly Catholic people.