09 May 2008
Varia about the Loooooooooooooooooooooooong-Awaited New Roman Missal Translation
From a story at CNS concerning topics for the upcoming U.S. Bishop's meeting in June, there are some items of interest:
Liturgy, stem cells, sex abuse among topics at bishops' June meeting
By Nancy Frazier O'Brien
As they begin what Bishop Arthur J. Serratelli of Paterson, N.J., chairman of the USCCB Committee on Divine Worship, called "the final phase of the process of translation and approval of the Roman Missal for use in the United States," the bishops will vote on a new translation of the proper prayers for each Sunday and feast day during the liturgical year.
But in a break from previous practice, the 700-page draft text of the readings was distributed to the bishops not on paper but only in electronic form, except for special requests.
"In an effort to save on paper and to 'go green,' we've been trying to get people using the Web more" for documentation ahead of the bishops' meeting, said Mercy Sister Mary Ann Walsh, director of media relations for the USCCB. "The liturgy document is so large it seems wasteful" to print copies unnecessarily, she added.
As any semi-regular reader of this blog knows, I do not buy into the environmentalism-as-religion thing. I don't buy into the man-made global warming hoax. And I might say that to be used for the printing of the Mass and readings would be a glorious end for any tree.
What I do know from experience with my parents and grandparents is that (with exceptions, obviously-- this is a general observation) the older a person is the less likely they are to be adept at using electronic media, computers, and similar gadgetry. With most Bishops over age 50, I wonder whether the lack of paper copies of such an important document will mean that it is not as carefully read. I'm serious. When the USCCB has translators "assisting" it who can translate "pro multis" as "for all", I would like their work very carefully checked. In the spirit of helping out, I would like to point out that "credo" means "I believe", not "we believe".
And really, do we need to hear that the Church is "going green"? Symbolic public relations gestures to please the secular press seem silly to me. How about "going Catholic"?
On a Spanish-language liturgical matter, the bishops will be asked to approve a change from the formal "vosotros" to the more familiar "ustedes" in Spanish-language Masses in the U.S.
Although both words mean the plural "you" in English, "vosotros" is "no longer current speech" in most of the Spanish-speaking world, except in Spain, Bishop Serratelli said in an introductory note to his fellow bishops on the proposed change.
In 2006 the heads of 22 national liturgical commissions in Latin America and the Caribbean asked the Vatican that the order of the Mass in Spanish be published "using 'ustedes' in place of 'vosotros' since the majority of Catholics who speak Spanish (more than 90 percent) use 'ustedes,'" the introduction noted.
It is small comfort to see that the dumbing down of liturgical vernacular language is not a purely English-language phenomenon. No one argues that the Spanish-speaking faithful don't know what vosotros means. Is it too "elevated" or "remote" from the people? You know, because it's all about US.
This is the same argument that the liturgical minimalists use all the time. For instance, to get back to the English language translation of the Creed, minimalists state (without any support, mind you) that we are too stupid to understand "consubstantial", as in "consubstantial with the Father", describing Christ's Being. Well, the word is a very precise way to describe an eternal reality of our faith.
If only our Churches were equipped with some kind of pulpit, or ambo, where a priest or deacon (memo to St. Cronan's: only a priest or deacon) could give some kind of sermon, or homily-- maybe after the Gospel. If we had that, then he could explain moral and theological concepts to the faithful. Concepts like consubstantial. Or transubstantiation. Or pro multis.
I hope that happens.