UPDATE: In all sincerity, I wanted to acknowledge that Mr. Peters is undoubtedly very busy, and I am sure he does not need me to reorder his to-do list. That being said, I did want to point out for my readers, and for the record, that this makes 2 of the 3 anti-requirement proponents who have declined to refute the argument or more fully explain and bolster their previous statements in light of the pro-requirement canonist's article. Jimmy Akin has yet to respond.
So far, nobody has taken the opportunity to seriously address the canonist's argument in my post.
From his blog: