21 March 2009

Going to Prom in a Handbasket

I have to say, this is the best article I have read in the Post-Dispatch in a long time.  In what I hope is the last post I ever make on the Burroughs prom, Aisha Sultan of the Post writes a very good piece from a non-religious perspective with the headline you see above.

Her final sentence goes to the heart of the logically-challenged and conscience-devoid defense of this prom theme as advanced by the vast majority of Burroughs students and parents:

"Arrogance is a weak defense."

Very true.  But check out the comments she samples in her column.  These people really think we are all out there wailing and gnashing our teeth that we are not part of the benighted Burroughs family and must send our children to poor public schools.  Please.  They can't even begin to understand that they are the dim ones-- they pay $20,000 a year for the same moral formation that they could get forced on them for free in public schools.  Jane Austen describes the whole situation very well:

"Vanity working on a weak mind produces every kind of mischief."

I will return to my original take.  This prom is the product of the educational system that creates, allows, excuses and even celebrates it.  It is only one of many reasons why I am glad I homeschool.

From STLToday:

The prom invitation from hell

by Aisha Sultan

The prom invitation from hell has the students at John Burroughs School a bit overheated.

The junior class, which hosts the prom, voted for the Seven Deadly Sins as its theme. The invitations calling all "sinners" and beckoning them to "hell" went out about three weeks ago. The invitations feature illustrations of the various deadly sins (the one for lust has a buxom woman in a long red dress) and a fiery pentagram. It states: "Let the Sin Begin." 

It looks to me like a flier for a cheap nightclub. 

Andy Abbott, who will take over as head of school this summer, admits there was a lapse in judgment by the adults in the party-planning process who approved the invitation. 

"I think it was a mistake," Abbott said this week. "There are some things on those invitations that have offended people's religious observances, and I don't think they were intended to. We are very sad that it has offended people, and we regret that they went out."

But besides those who may have taken offense for religious reasons, many were upset that one of the area's finest private schools seemed to be striving for a "Gossip Girl"-worthy prom. Taken at face value, the invitations seem like a celebration of teenage debauchery. 

"I think the school culture at Burroughs is exactly opposite that," Abbott said. 

In actuality, the prom at Burroughs is deliberately more low-key than those at most high schools. It is held inside the school — not at an expensive hotel — and students help decorate. 

"The whole idea of our prom being held on campus is to fight against that impulse to celebrate wealth," Abbott added. (Tuition at Burroughs nears $20,000.) He suggested that this image is so far removed from the reality of life at Burroughs that the invitation may, in fact, have been an attempt at irony.

I posted pictures of the invitation on our parenting blog last week and asked whether they were appropriate for a high school prom. Some readers chastised me for doing so, saying that a private school should be off-limits for comment by anyone other than those attending it. But private institutions are part of our community and make news all the time. And a school that prides itself on developing critical thinking skills for the leaders of tomorrow might want to encourage a larger cultural debate — even one critical of their school. No institution is above reproach. 


 think that's what they call a teachable moment.

Here are some of the comments from STLtoday.com/parentstalkback from those identifying themselves as either
JBS students or alumni: 

— "Even many right-wing fundamentalist parents will gladly fork over 20k a year to send their kids to this godless place as long as 30 percent of each class still winds up headed for Ivy League university."

— "Look at the college attendance rate, which colleges are being chosen by Burroughs grads, SAT/ACT score, accomplishments ... then you will see a true reflection on John Burroughs."

— "The main voices going against the theme are coming from public school parents wanting to justify their own greed by not putting forth the effort to secure the highest education for their children."

— "Stop embarrassing yourselves, have kids, send them to Burroughs and let them get a good enough education so they can make logical and sound arguments for you."

— "These responses are the feeble attempts of parents to justify their poor choices that lead them to sending their kids to mediocre public schools."

— "This all simply stems from jealousy. Perhaps your kids didn't get in/perhaps YOU didn't get in 30 years ago."

— "(
JBS students) will be scoring in the 99th percentile on the SATs and getting into the top schools in the country."

— "John Burroughs' students routinely place in the top ½ of 1% of academic achievement in this community. Don't they deserve a night to kick loose in between their acceptance into the Ivy Leagues?"

— "Except for the
MICDS kids that couldn't didn't get into Burroughs, NO ONE will deny that Burroughs is the best high school education offered in St. Louis."

— "Inevitably, it will be these same students who designed this 'Horrific and satanic' invitation who will be well-regarded members of society and will be paying taxes that go towards your friend's
wellfare (sic) allowance 10 years from now." 

My take: Arrogance is a weak defense.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

THE "SOCIAL KINGSHIP" OF CHRIST: THE FALL OF A CHRISTIAN NATION

Ultimately, what this little matter of this prom invitation makes clear is that THE RULING CLASS in America, that is the rich and the powerful in both of the major political parties, and regardless of religious affiliation or lackthereof, IS THOROUGHLY DE-CHRISTIANIZED.

You can either celebrate that fact, decry it, or consider it to be a matter of indifference. But you cannot deny that this is a fact.

So Catholics believe they are following Vatican II by taking the position that it is best and right for culture, schools, and government to be absolutely neutral, diverse, and pluralistic regarding religion.

They believe that the Catholic Church should just take its place along with all the other religions, and should work to be a positive influence for humanistic values that all humans can agree on, but in no sense dominate society, culture, schools, or government in terms of Christianizing society, culture, schools and government.

That, they say, would be "unfair" to non-Christians.

But, of course, the net result, is a Sodom and Gomorrah society.

Other Catholics (even some in complete and good standing with the pope) assert the "Social Kingship" of Christ the King, meaning that the pre-Vatican II idea of Catholic Church dominance in culture and government is really the right aim and position.

They say that Vatican II did not really call for the end of the "Social Kingship" of Christ and His Church.

If you want to research this, type "social kingship" into Google.

Yes, this topic is related to the assertion by many Muslim that Sharia Law should and must prevail everywhere on earth.

In the final analysis, some form of Law and Order in society will prevail:

--Sodom and Gomorrah Law
--Sharia Law
--The Law of Christ and His Church("The Social Kingship of Christ")

It is a juvenile fantasy to suppose that "to each there own" is a workable, sustainable model for society and government. Oh, sorry, didn't mean to call names. Me bad. Mea culpa. Change "juvenile fantasy" to "big mistake."

Hope that did not bore anyone. Thought it might interest someone.

Javier

Anonymous said...

QUOTE OF OUR BLOGMASTER IN THE JEWISH LIGHT NEWSPAPER

"In no way am I saying Burroughs should embrace Catholic values."

With all due respect to our honorable Blogmaster, why isn't he saying the Burroughs school should embrace Catholic values?

Why isn't he saying that they should embrace even the entire Catholic faith, religion, liturgy, hierarchy, priesthood, etc.?

Hasn't the Catholic Church always taught that every soul should and needs to convert to the Catholic religion?

Assuming that newspaper quoted our Blogmaster correctly, why did he say such a thing?

Would Jesus have said that? St. Paul? St. Francis Xavier? St. Francis of Assisi? (he tried to convert Muslim while he was in their captivity!).

To me, this all related to the modern/liberal idea that no one should dominated anyone.

But the very word "Lord" means "dominator." In the Traditional Latin Mass we are constantly saying "Dominus," which means "Lord," which means "Dominator."

Jesus Christ and His Church are called to dominate everyone. That's just a truth of the Faith.

Isn't it? I think so.

But, I would be happy to be corrected.

And I do respect and honor our Blogmaster.

Javier

thetimman said...

Javier, reread my introduction on that post before the article itself, and you will have your explanation.

Peggy said...

Wow! We're so much smarter than you rubes in the public schools. Geesh! And families who don't send kids to Burroughs are "selfish"? Interesting this kind of arrogance was something that Bp. Braxton wanted to ensure did NOT guide the Belleville diocesan high schools, at least one of which has always had an elitist reputation. But these non-religious schools simply fall back on their claims at intellectual superiority. They sound just like the Ivies where the kids are intended to go. I read an article a few months ago suggesting that the Ivies "best and brightest" (the east coast elitists) were not really that. But that kids on this track learned the right answers and opinions and how to play the game. The Burroughs kids will fit right in. It looks like some of in the midwest have that same problem. It's part of the false wisdom and lack of real intellect of academia in the US.

I had forgotten until I moved back that the midwest relies on ACT tests, while the east/Ivies rely on SAT scores for college entry.

cmziall said...

Ahem, shouldn't your comment read:

"It is only one of many reasons why I am glad WE homeschool"? ? ?

:o)

Patrick Kinsale said...

I think it is sad that some people are more concerned about what college their kids get into than what kind of adults their kids become.

Latinmassgirl said...

Introducing. . . The Timman, who is making news by his blog! Way to go! Thanks for getting mind-numbed people in the secular world to notice things they may not have before.