06 September 2011

Hooters Finally Catches a Break from the Church or, the Call for Decorum

You may recall the national dust-up when Catholic Charities sensibly reconsidered its prior not-sensible decision to work with Hooters in a fundraising effort for St. Patrick Center.  Media template story:  "The poor Hooters girls just wanted to help, but the mean old Church wouldn't let them!"

Well, I doubt this story gets legs, but the Seattle Times has run a Scripps Howard story about a woman in an unidentified Catholic parish who, decked out in a Hooters T-shirt, was not turned away from the (metaphorical only, alas) communion rail.  However, this incident highlights the push in some parishes to plead for greater decorum in dress.  I post it below, with just a few comments I couldn't resist:

Religion: No Hooters shirts in Mass, please

Americans getting more casual in what they wear to church.

Deacon Greg Kandra was well aware that modern Americans were getting more casual and that these laid-back attitudes were filtering into Catholic pews.

Still, was that woman who was approaching the altar to receive Holy Communion really wearing a Hooters shirt?

Yes, she was.

When did Catholics, he thought to himself, start coming to Mass dressed for a Britney Spears concert? Had he missed a memo or something?

"Somewhere along the way, we went from neckties to tank tops, and from fasting to fast food. And it's getting worse," noted Kandra, a former CBS News writer with 26 years, two Emmys and two Peabody Awards to his credit. He is now a deacon assigned to Our Lady Queen of Martyrs, a 3,000-member parish in Forest Hills, just north of New York City.

"I recently had to tell a couple that no, they could not have their Chihuahua in a tuxedo as part of their wedding party,"he added, in a Patheos.com commentary. 

"An auxiliary bishop in Indianapolis recently complained about people who tweet during funerals. Casual Catholics, it seems, have taken 'casual' to a new level."

After the Hooters incident, he decided it was time to stop whining about the rising tide of irreverence and immodesty and to start griping about it right out in the open. Thus, Kandra and the parish's other clergy have resorted to appealing — in the parish bulletin and in public remarks — for a hint of sanity or even some old-fashioned decorum.

One bulletin item proclaimed, with a gag headline: "PLANS FOR PARISH SWIMMING POOL SCRAPPED! After much study, our finance committee has determined it would not be feasible to construct an indoor swimming pool in our church. (Although if you call it a baptismal font funds can be found)... As a result, we can now announce with certainty that those who have been arriving for Mass as if dressed for the pool need not do so. Also, we hope to keep the air conditioning cranking all summer long. So you do not need to wear shorts, halter tops or bikinis to Mass."

Other missives in this series warned that late-arriving parishioners with allegedly faulty alarm clocks might be injured during their attempts to "find a seat by climbing over the rope strung across the aisle. This can result in falls or — in some cases — embarrassing displays of underwear."

And about the many active cellphones: "New research indicates that people who bring cellphones to church are more likely to suffer serious head trauma, usually caused by the priest throwing the lectionary at them. Such people are also more likely to be wounded by hurled umbrellas and rolled-up missals."

It's easy to determine what is going on in his parish and elsewhere, said 74-year-old Monsignor Joseph Funaro. Decades ago, (How many decades ago?) worshipers would dress up to go to church and then would return home to change into more casual clothing before heading to picnics, baseball games, the pool or away to the coast.

Today, the sprawl of suburban life and omnipresent traffic jams — especially close to Labor Day and beach-friendly weekends — have tempted Catholics to abandon the old church-first schedule. The clothes symbolize larger changes.

"We have reached the point that just about anything goes,"said Funaro. "We keep making appeals to our people, but it doesn't seem that anyone is paying much attention. ... Some of the ladies, well, you just have to wonder if they looked in a mirror before coming to church."

The key, he said, is not that formal attire has evolved into casual attire. That change took place several decades ago (What happened several decades ago?) for most baby boomer adults and their children. Now, more and more Catholics have moved past casual clothing and have started wearing clothing that is distracting, at best, or is often aggressively immodest.

As a priest, Funaro said that he now worries that some of his parishioners are not really focusing on the Mass at all. Instead, they are stopping by the church while on their way to other activities they consider more important than Mass. The message given over the last 40 years by their pastors has reinforced, subtly or not-so-subtly, that Mass isn't really all that important.  They may just be buying the message given.

"I often ask people this question: 'Would you dress like that if you were going to meet the queen of England?' Of course, they always say, 'No, of course not.' (There was a time not so long ago that a Catholic going to meet the Queen of England would have been in irons, or on a hurdle, or in a rack... But I digress.)


Peggy IL said...

FYI--Terry Mattingly is the Get Religion fellow, critiquing religious reporting. He's a columnist as well. Deacon Greg Kandra has a blog, I think called the Deacon's Bench.

JBQ said...

I went to the first Mass at St. Elizabeth after the suppression of the Latin Rite Mass. Msgr. Cronin did a nice job with the combo Latin Mass. I was horrifed at the dress of two young ladies with their mother. They were about 14 and 15 with extremely tight shorts that were about four inches in length. I talked with the Msgr. and followed up with a letter. He as very responsive and stated that there were concerns raised in the bulletin. It was my feeling that this was intentional in the "takeover" of the Latin Mass. The girls went to Communion and took it in the hand and giggled the entire time. The mother appeared not only to condone but to abet. She was dressed properly. It appeared to be a concerted effort to embarrass the Latin Mass and its supporters.

Fenian said...

Just an aside, the author of that article is Terry Mattingly, who is behind TMatt.net and GetReligion.org

Anyone interested in critiques of religious journalism should take a look at those sites.

D Paul said...

What do you really believe is the cause if this? It's Vatican II or at least an interpretation of Vatican II and never the twain shall meet. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me". John 8:32 "You shall seek the truth and the truth will set you free". I would say that you personally are a bit naive about the role of the devil and the problems in the Catholic Church or what is left of it. Fulton Sheen stated that "America is suffering not so much from intolerance, which is bogotry as it is from tolerance, which is indifference to truth and error, and a philosophical nonchalance that has been interpreted as broad-mindedness". This archdiocese has been taken over by a "gay cabal" and the jettisoning of AB Raymond Burke. Until you personally come to grips with the real aspect of the devil and the suppression of the Latin Mass, then your blog is not worth the "paper that it is printed on". Malachi Martin said it all and you are playing "ping pong with the truth". Semper Fi.

thetimman said...

JBQ, the fairly common site of modern girls dressed inappropriately for Mass can hardly be attributed to a deliberate attempt to embarrass the Latin Mass or its supporters. I think it is just a family who doesn't realize that better dress is expected-- lamentable, yes, but I wouldn't see enemies where there are none.

D Paul,

I don't think that cdg thinks I'm too naive about the problems with the devil in the Church and the ill-treatment of the traditional Mass, but he would probably agree with you that my blog isn't 'worth the paper it's printed on.'