24 April 2014

Alabama Supreme Court Rules Unborn Child has "inalienable right to life from its earliest stages"

This is not in context of an abortion case, but the logic of the holding puts it squarely against that excrement-on-paper, Roe v. Wade. It is just so good to see a judge willing to stand up for reality for once. Pray for this Court. I'm sure there will be blowback.

From Lifesite News:

MONTGOMERY, AL, April 22, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) –– Children in the womb should have the same legal standing as other children, the Supreme Court of Alabama ruled Friday.

The decision upheld the prior conviction of Sarah Janie Hicks for “the chemical endangerment of her child,” when she exposed her unborn baby to cocaine. The boy, referred to as “JD,” was born testing positive for cocaine.

The 8-1 decision reaffirmed the Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling in a similar case last year that the word “child” includes “unborn child.”

Friday’s decision was a review of the lower Court of Criminal Appeals’ conviction of Hicks.

According to Justice Tom Parker, who wrote the majority decision, “It is impossible for an unborn child to be a separate and distinct person at a particular point in time in one respect and not to be a separate and distinct person at the same point in time but in another respect. Because an unborn child has an inalienable right to life from its earliest stages of development, it is entitled not only to a life free from the harmful effects of chemicals at all stages of development but also to life itself at all stages of development. Treating an unborn child as a separate and distinct person in only select respects defies logic and our deepest sense of morality.”


1 comment:

truthseeker said...

Sweet Home Alabama!