29 April 2015

"No one has won anything here; we’ve all lost."

I am honored to be able to publish here the text of a letter from an unnamed priest, writing to Catholics about the resignation of His Excellency Robert Finn. It says it as well as it can be said. I have edited it slightly to remove some personal references; the substance is his:


"As you all know, Bishop Finn has resigned ... This comes after a long, bitter, nasty campaign by many of our brothers and sisters, who, for whatever reason, were convinced that he needed to go. … It is now, therefore, time to say a few things in the open during this time of sorrow for him, and for our diocese.

First of all, for the instigators of this unfortunate event, the issue was never the Ratigan affair. There were definitely mistakes made in handling the situation by people who, it turned out, were in over their heads, but there was never any malice, or impulse to cover up anything. I will not recount the story here, but I will say this: If this had happened on another, more popular bishop’s watch, the aftermath we have seen would not have occurred, because the motivation for the mob-scene that ensued was Bishop Finn’s fidelity to a classical concept of the church, not the cover-up of any misconduct.

For years before the bishop’s arrival, there had been in place a bleak outlook on the future shape of the church, a church without many priests, a church run “out of necessity” by laypeople, lay administrators, with priests as the sacramental suppliers, not leaders. It was said a lack of vocations was the reason for the new organizational principles adopted here, but, in fact, the lack of vocations was self-inflicted. Certain radicalized theologians and catechetical experts after the council had predicted a priest-less church, and some labored to bring this to fruition. In the’90’s in out diocese we sometimes had less than 5 seminarians in any given year, and this reality was used to prop up the idea that the post-Vatican II church was meant to be a new church, with a new organizational chart.

Bishop Finn, as most modern, younger bishops after the council, decisively rejected this depressive scenario, put much less money into programs established for the bleak future, and, instead, put money and resources into the development of priestly vocations, and we have seen the result. We will have 10 new priests in all this fiscal year, and have many in the past several years. Though we will ordain so many, we have more men applying right now than the number we’re ordaining.

People complain that these young priest candidates are conservative, and that the Vocations Office is recruiting only conservative seminarians. This is untrue. [The office has] never had an ideological litmus test for incoming students. What is true is that service in the church, dating back into the early ‘90’s, …was attractive to young men who loved the church, knew she was 2000 years old, loved her traditions and teachings, and hadn’t grown up in the ‘60’s time of turmoil. In other words, they were not, as a group, like their elders. And, as the men in my generation, they are allowed to be who they are. The vocations truly, were always there. The lack was in my generation’s insistence that the young men hold the same ideologies as we did. I saw many a young man turned away from the seminary in the early days for not having the “correct” leanings and attitudes. May God have mercy on us for our hubris and over-weaning pride.

Those who are celebrating now began their work long ago, not because of the Ratigan case, but because Bishop Finn rejected their view of church reality. He was an “arch-conservative,” “pre-Vatican II,” “trying to take us back to the medieval church,” all these bits of nonsense that covered up the real truth: Post-conciliar ego and pride, the belief that we finally knew more than those thousands of saints who had gone before us, had led to the destruction of much of our church, the loss of clergy and religious, compromise with the world, especially in moral matters, the endangering of our families and children, and our own spiritual bankruptcy. The “Springtime of the Church of Vatican II” has never come, because we, in our smug superiority, had severed our connection with our past and Catholic Tradition. The tree cannot flower without its roots intact.

One of the most disturbing things I have seen in my years as a priest is the glee and meanness of many of our brothers and sisters in the aftermath of Bishop Finn’s resignation. Champagne corks popped, celebrations begun, more mean and vicious things said by people whose Lord Jesus said to them, “Love one another.” There is no forbearance or forgiveness for this man who pled no contest to a politically motivated charge filed by an ambitious prosecutor with strong ties to the abortion industry, so that he might save his local church the pain and cost of a public trial. The statute used was not even applicable to what happened, but such is our legal and political society. He is a man who loves and cherishes children, and would never for one minute hazard them for any reason. … But the outrage of many was managed by the designs of a few, and here we are.

What has this whole thing done to us? Is our love and respect conditional? [One person] put up a post on Facebook, “I hope Bishop Finn rots in Hell forever.” We have become mean, low and self-involved. The vicious attacks by Christians against Christians that we see day to day have become the norm. Whatever happened to praying for your enemy, blessing those who persecute you? Who are we and what have we become? No one has won anything here; we’ve all lost. An honorable man has been unjustly disgraced, and we have sacrificed his dignity and our own in a rush to punish and destroy, things antithetical to everything our common faith represents.

If any good is to come of this, it must come from the grace of God in the humble hearts of His faithful children. Let us learn the lessons again from Christ who is meek and humble of heart. His yoke is easy and His burden light. Let us not take upon ourselves the heavy yoke of hate and spite; they, in the end, are too much for us to bear without us losing everything the Lord wishes to give us. May God’s peace give us clean and humble hearts.

In the Sacred Heart of our Crucified Lord,"


Anonymous said...

The persons I know well acquainted with Bishop Finn have always spoken of him as a very holy and “stand-up” man and priest. He was able to ascertain correctly what Kenrick-Glennon Seminary in St. Louis had become and ceased sending the seminarians of his archdiocese there. He wanted to make sure they received the proper formation required to make good parish priests for the diocese. I am sorry that Bishop Finn’s time shepherding the Kansas City – St. Joseph Diocese ended this way. I will keep him in prayer, as well as other bishops and archbishops under attack.


chantgirl said...

The cases of Bishop Juan Barros and Cardinal Danneels make Finn's ouster especially bitter.

Lynette said...

This will be the time when people in retrospect will look at our diocese of KC/St. Joseph and see the beginning of some very good things here, due exactly to the good leadership skills and insight of dear Bishop Finn. These men and women, who were against him from the very minute they got word of who was coming to KC, told him what they could and would do, and they succeeded, or so they think in their darkened minds. The Shawn Ratigan incident just gave them the opportunity and the press they needed. They blocked the way in some things, but he led the way to many good things while here, working where he could, in what I believe to be great humility, despite the growing and continuous onslaught. Despite all the appeals to Peace and Justice, worldly justice has not been served in his case and, regarding peace, the diocese is now split more than it ever has been. The good news is, most of these folks that had worked feverishly and in the darkened corners for a laity-led institution are growing older and they have not reproduced themselves. We heard the words from a well-known EWTN preacher a fews ago when describing them, “spiritual geldings”, as they are not attractive and they cannot reproduce. Their heyday is short. But Bishop Finn’s work is showing good fruit now and the harvest will be great in future generations. His reward is not here and now, but his enemies are reveling in theirs. May God have mercy on all of us and not give any of us what we deserve. Back to the catacombs, perhaps, for a time.

Hoser said...

I lived in KC back in the days of pre VII and Post VII and saw many priests and nuns leave their orders and vocations, because of some new-found freedom. That freedom seemed to inflict the KC St J's Diocese with an unending disease that bread priests that abused children at an unprecedented rate. Bishop Finn seemed to have solved that problem with the exception of Fr. Ratigan, who did the unspeakable, and Bishop Finn did or did not act fast enough for the local legal eagles. In any event, the Diocese seemed to recover to the days of old, many priests were being brought up for ordination, which speaks volumes for the local Episcopacy, believe me.

I hope that KC-St. Joe's liberal parishioners get their heads on straight, because their souls are in crisis if they don't.